Substance evidence
Cannabidiol (CBD)
The anxiety evidence, the dose gap, and the liver signal.
page first published · last updated
What Its Legal Status Actually Means
Read this before anything below it. Legal to sell is not the same fact as reviewed, verified, or approved.
There is no FDA-approved psychiatric indication for CBD — not for anxiety, depression, PTSD, insomnia, or any other mental health condition. One cannabidiol product is FDA-approved: Epidiolex (plant-derived purified CBD oral solution), indicated for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, or tuberous sclerosis complex in patients 1 year and older. Everything else sold as CBD is an unapproved consumer product: the 2018 Farm Bill removed hemp (cannabis containing no more than 0.3% delta-9 THC by dry weight, 7 U.S.C. 1639o) from the Controlled Substances Act, but the FDA has stated it is unlawful to add CBD to food or to market it as a dietary supplement, denied three industry citizen petitions asking for a rulemaking to permit supplement marketing (January 2023), and concluded that existing food and supplement frameworks are not appropriate for CBD and that a new pathway from Congress is needed. In practice that means retail CBD is sold with no premarket review of potency, purity, or claims.
Quoted whole from the 2026-08-18 study harvest. Not summarized, not shortened.
does cbd work for anxiety or sleep? what the trials and the fda say
cbd has one fda label, for the prescription product epidiolex, and the label facts below are read from it on dailymed: set id 8bf27097-4870-43fb-94f0-f3d0871d1eec, spl version 35, effective may 29, 2026. everything sold as cbd without a prescription has no label, and the regulator facts about it come from the fda’s own pages, read on the verification date, and from the legal-status paragraph above. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-06.
cannabidiol, cbd, is one of more than eighty compounds in the cannabis plant and the one that does not produce a high [fda-regulation]. it is sold in oils, gummies, drinks and creams for anxiety, sleep and pain, and one purified form of it is a prescription medicine for three rare epilepsies. that split is the whole story of this page: the only cbd with an fda label was tested at doses of 10 to 25 mg per kg of body weight a day in children with severe seizures, and the only randomised trials showing any effect on anxiety used single doses of 300 or 600 mg of pharmaceutical cbd in laboratory stress tests. this section says what the one approved use is and what the fda has said about every other use, what the epidiolex label found about the liver, sleepiness and drug interactions, what the anxiety and sleep trials measured and found in both directions, and what independent testing found in the bottles. every number is from the label, an fda document, or a study record on this page, and each source is linked at the end.
this is information to take to a prescriber or pharmacist. nothing here tells anyone to take cbd or to stop, nothing here says where to get it, and nothing here is a reason to put off treatment that works.
the one approved use, and what the fda has said about the rest
the fda has approved one cbd product: epidiolex, a purified plant-derived cannabidiol oral solution, for seizures associated with lennox-gastaut syndrome and dravet syndrome (approved june 2018) and tuberous sclerosis complex (added july 2020), in patients one year and older [label 1; fda-regulation]. the fda’s own words: that approval "means fda has concluded that this particular drug product is safe and effective for its intended use". there is no fda-approved cbd for anxiety, depression, insomnia, ptsd or any other mental health condition [status; fda-regulation]. epidiolex is not a controlled substance [label 9.1].
everything else sold as cbd is an unapproved consumer product. the 2018 farm bill removed hemp, cannabis with no more than 0.3% delta-9 thc by dry weight, from the controlled substances act, but the fda states that this "explicitly preserved fda’s authority" over products containing cannabis compounds, and that "it is currently illegal to market cbd by adding it to a food or labeling it as a dietary supplement" [fda-regulation; fda-consumer]. on january 26, 2023, the fda concluded "that a new regulatory pathway for cbd is needed", denied three citizen petitions asking it to allow cbd as a dietary supplement, and wrote that "it is not apparent how cbd products could meet safety standards for dietary supplements or food additives", because "we have not found adequate evidence to determine how much cbd can be consumed, and for how long, before causing harm" [fda-2023]. in practice that means retail cbd is sold with no premarket review of potency, purity or claims [status].
the fda’s enforcement has been warning letters, not a ban. its running list of letters to firms selling cannabis-derived products, including cbd and delta-8 thc, runs from 2015 to 2025 and held about 160 entries when read on the verification date (page dated september 3, 2025) [fda-letters]. the fda describes the letters as going to companies that claimed cbd products "prevent, diagnose, treat, mitigate, or cure serious diseases such as cancer, alzheimer’s disease, psychiatric disorders and diabetes", and its news releases list letters for claims about opioid addiction, pain relief, and infant teething and ear pain [fda-consumer; fda-regulation]. a warning letter is a regulator’s finding about a company’s marketing claim; it is not a finding that cbd does or does not work, and this page draws no inference from the letters beyond what the fda states.
what the epidiolex label found: the liver, sleepiness, suicidal thoughts and interactions
the label is the only place a regulator has written down what cbd does to the body at measured doses, and it is read here for that reason [label; risks], with the caveat the fda itself gives: the trials were in people with severe epilepsy, almost all on other anti-seizure drugs, at 10 to 25 mg per kg a day [label 6.1; fda-consumer]. the label’s own abuse-potential study maps doses to adults: 750, 1,500 and 4,500 mg correspond to 10, 20 and 60 mg per kg in a 75 kg adult [label 9.2], so the lowest trial dose is roughly 750 mg a day for an average adult.
- liver [5.1]: "epidiolex can cause dose-related elevations of liver transaminases." alt rose above three times the upper limit of normal in 13% of patients on 10 or 20 mg/kg and 12% on 25 mg/kg, against 1% on placebo; fewer than 1% exceeded twenty times the limit; some were hospitalised. the risk was 17% at 20 mg/kg against 1% at 10 mg/kg. it was concentrated in people also taking valproate: 30% with valproate and clobazam, 21% with valproate alone, 4% with clobazam alone, 3% with neither. most elevations came in the first two months, some up to 18 months in; about two thirds resolved after stopping or reducing cbd or valproate and about a third resolved during continued treatment. the label requires liver tests before starting and at one, three and six months [2.1, 5.1]. the fda’s consumer page adds that liver injury "was seen also in patients not on those drugs" and that it is "less clear how it might be managed when cbd is used far more widely, without medical supervision" [fda-consumer].
- sleepiness [5.2]: somnolence and sedation in 32% of patients on 10 or 20 mg/kg against 11% on placebo, 46% in those also taking clobazam. the label says not to drive or operate machinery until the effect is known, and that alcohol and other cns depressants add to it [5.2, 7.4]. in the 25 mg/kg trial the figure was 19% against 17%.
- suicidal thoughts [5.3]: the class warning carried by every anti-seizure drug, including epidiolex: in a pooled analysis of 199 placebo-controlled trials of 11 such drugs, 0.43% of drug-treated patients had suicidal thoughts or behaviour against 0.24% on placebo, about twice the risk and one extra case per 530 people treated. it is a class finding, not a cbd finding, and the label applies it to cbd because cbd is an anti-seizure drug.
- other drugs [7]: cbd is cleared by and interferes with several liver enzymes. the label says it raises the active metabolite of clobazam, raises blood levels of everolimus about 2.5-fold, and can raise or lower levels of drugs cleared by cyp2c19, cyp1a2, cyp2b6, cyp2c8 and ugt1a9, including, by the label’s named example, lowering the active form of clopidogrel. rifampin lowered cbd levels by about a third [7.1]. the library row on this label notes that some of the enzymes named also clear citalopram, escitalopram, clozapine, olanzapine and some benzodiazepines, and that nobody has measured the effect at retail doses [epidiolex-row]. the valproate label carries the mirror warning: with cannabidiol, raised liver enzymes, and liver tests during the combination [valproate-row].
- the rest [6.1]: in the lennox-gastaut and dravet trials, decreased appetite in 16% to 22% against 5% on placebo, diarrhoea 9% to 20% against 9%, raised transaminases 8% to 16% against 3%, rash 7% to 13% against 3%, and 16% lost at least 5% of body weight against 8%. dropouts for side effects were 2.7% at 10 mg/kg and 11.8% at 20 mg/kg against 1.3%. about 30% developed a new laboratory-defined anaemia against 13%. hypersensitivity reactions including angioedema occurred, and the product contains sesame oil [5.4].
- addiction [9.2, 9.3]: in a human abuse-potential study, cbd at 750 to 4,500 mg produced "drug liking" scores within the placebo range, while 2 mg of alprazolam and 10 to 30 mg of synthetic thc produced large increases; 28 days at 1,500 mg a day produced no withdrawal signs over six weeks. the label concludes cbd "likely does not produce physical dependence". this is one of the few places where the label is reassuring, and it is also one of the few findings that plausibly carries down to retail doses.
what the anxiety trials measured, in whom, and for how long
the trials that people cite for cbd and anxiety are laboratory challenge studies, not treatment trials; the companion page on this site walks through the same five records in more detail [topic-page]. in the first, 24 never-treated people with social anxiety disorder received a single 600 mg dose of cbd or placebo 90 minutes before a simulated public-speaking test; the cbd group reported less anxiety, cognitive impairment and discomfort during the speech, ending close to an untreated healthy comparison group [bergamaschi-2011]. in the second, 57 healthy men received 150, 300 or 600 mg or placebo before the same kind of test; only the 300 mg dose reduced anxiety, and 150 and 600 mg were no different from placebo, an inverted-u that means more is not better [linares-2019]. both came from the same university research group, several of whose members are co-inventors on a cbd patent the university has licensed to pharmaceutical companies, and the 2019 trial’s cbd was supplied free by a manufacturer [bergamaschi-2011; linares-2019].
the most-cited review of cbd for anxiety, from 2015, concluded that the animal evidence is strong but the human evidence is limited to single acute doses, with very few studies in people who have an anxiety disorder and essentially none on daily dosing; ten years on, that gap has not been filled [blessing-2015]. the harvest’s own note is blunter: every controlled trial showing an anxiolytic signal used a single oral dose of 300 or 600 mg of pharmaceutical-grade cbd, no controlled trial has tested the far smaller amounts in retail oils, gummies or vapes, and no controlled trial has tested repeated daily dosing for an anxiety or mood disorder [exclusions].
the largest review to date, published in 2026, pooled 54 randomised trials of cannabinoids as a primary treatment for mental and substance-use disorders in 2,477 people, searched to may 2025. it found no significant effect on anxiety outcomes and no randomised evidence at all for depression. cannabinoids raised the odds of any adverse event (odds ratio 1.75; one extra person harmed for every seven treated) without raising serious adverse events, and the authors concluded that routine use for mental disorders "is currently rarely justified" [wilson-2026]. that review covers cannabinoids broadly, cbd among them; it is the pooled answer to the single-dose signals above.
sleep: what the records on this page can and cannot say
no study record on this page is a trial of cbd for insomnia, and the harvest found no controlled trial of daily cbd for a sleep disorder to include [exclusions]. what exists is indirect. the epidiolex label counts somnolence and sedation as the most common nervous-system side effect, in 32% of patients against 11% on placebo, with a dose relationship [label 5.2]. the fda’s consumer page lists drowsiness as the most common change in alertness and warns that cbd with alcohol or with "other drugs that slow brain activity, such as those used to treat anxiety, panic, stress, or sleep disorders, increases the risk of sedation and drowsiness, which can lead to injuries" [fda-consumer]. the same page lists insomnia as a possible side effect too. so the honest statement is that cbd at prescription doses makes a third of people sleepy, that nobody has tested whether retail doses improve a sleep disorder, and that the combination with sleeping tablets or benzodiazepines is one the fda warns about.
what is in the bottle
laboratory analysis of 84 cbd products bought online found 26% contained less cbd than labelled and 43% more, roughly seven in ten mislabelled, and delta-9 thc was detected in 21% [bonn-miller-2017]. the study was funded by a cannabinoid research nonprofit on whose board three authors sit, a tie that cuts against the result rather than for it [bonn-miller-2017]. a 2023 analysis of 25 melatonin gummies found one product with no detectable melatonin and 31.3 mg of cbd instead [cohen-2023]. the fda reports testing products itself and finding that "many were found to not contain the levels of cbd they claimed", and that it is investigating reports of contaminants including pesticides, heavy metals and thc [fda-consumer]. whatever the trials found applies to the product and dose they used; a retail bottle cannot be assumed to contain the dose on its label.
what the research says, in both directions
in favour. a single 600 mg dose reduced anxiety in 24 people with social anxiety disorder in a laboratory test [bergamaschi-2011]; a single 300 mg dose did the same in healthy men [linares-2019]; the animal literature is consistent [blessing-2015]. at prescription doses cbd showed no abuse potential and no withdrawal, which the fda label states plainly [label 9.2, 9.3]. the fda has approved one form of it as safe and effective for its intended use, which is more than can be said of most supplements on this site [fda-regulation].
against, or smaller than it sounds. the two positive trials total 81 people, one dose each, in a laboratory, from one research group with patent interests, and the dose that worked was ten to a hundred times what retail products deliver [bergamaschi-2011; linares-2019; exclusions]. the pooled randomised evidence finds no effect on anxiety and none at all for depression, with more adverse events [wilson-2026]. the one label shows that at measured doses cbd raises liver enzymes in about one in eight people and interacts with common psychiatric drugs [label 5.1, 7]. the fda has said it cannot determine how much cbd can be consumed, and for how long, before causing harm [fda-2023], has flagged possible harm to the male reproductive system seen in animal studies [fda-consumer], and seven in ten retail products tested did not contain what the label said [bonn-miller-2017].
questions for a prescriber or pharmacist about cbd
each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.
- the only doses with any trial evidence for anxiety were single doses of 300 to 600 mg of pharmaceutical cbd. what dose is in the product i am looking at, and has anything like it ever been tested?
- i take valproate, clobazam, a benzodiazepine, clopidogrel, an antidepressant or an antipsychotic. the epidiolex label names enzymes that clear several of these. is anything i take on that list?
- at prescription doses cbd raised liver enzymes in about one in eight people and the label requires blood tests. is that a reason to check mine, and would anything about my liver make this a worse idea?
- the fda warns that cbd with alcohol or with medicines for anxiety, panic or sleep increases sedation and the risk of injury. does that apply to anything i take?
- seven in ten online products in one study did not contain the labelled dose and one in five contained thc. is there any way to know what is in a product, and does thc in it matter for me (a drug test, a job, pregnancy)?
- if i am considering this instead of a treatment with trials in thousands of people: the largest review found no effect on anxiety. what am i weighing?
questions people ask
- does cbd work for anxiety?
- not shown in a treatment trial. two laboratory studies found that a single dose of 300 mg (in 57 healthy men) or 600 mg (in 24 people with social anxiety disorder) of pharmaceutical cbd reduced anxiety during a simulated public-speaking test, with 150 and 600 mg failing in the dose-ranging study. no controlled trial has tested daily cbd for an anxiety disorder, and none has tested the much smaller doses in retail products. the largest review of randomised trials, 54 trials in 2,477 people published in 2026, found no significant effect of cannabinoids on anxiety and more adverse events.
- does cbd help you sleep?
- no trial on this page tested it for insomnia, and the harvest found no controlled trial of daily cbd for a sleep disorder. what is documented is that at prescription doses cbd causes drowsiness in about a third of people (32% vs 11% on placebo in the epidiolex trials), and that the fda warns that cbd with alcohol or with medicines for anxiety, panic or sleep increases sedation and the risk of injury. sleepiness as a side effect is not the same as a trial showing better sleep.
- is cbd fda approved or legal?
- one cbd product is approved: epidiolex, a purified cannabidiol oral solution, for seizures in lennox-gastaut syndrome, dravet syndrome and tuberous sclerosis complex from age one. no cbd is approved for anxiety, depression, insomnia or any mental health condition. the 2018 farm bill removed hemp with no more than 0.3% thc from the controlled substances act, but the fda states it is illegal to add cbd to food or label it as a dietary supplement, and in january 2023 it denied three petitions to allow that and said a new pathway from congress is needed. the fda has sent about 160 warning letters since 2015 to companies selling cannabis-derived products with disease claims.
- is cbd bad for your liver?
- at prescription doses it can be. in the epidiolex trials, 12% to 13% of patients had the liver enzyme alt rise above three times the normal limit against 1% on placebo, with some hospitalised; the rate was 17% at 20 mg/kg a day against 1% at 10 mg/kg, and 30% in people also taking valproate and clobazam against 3% in people on neither. the label requires liver tests before starting and at one, three and six months. the fda says liver injury was also seen in patients not on those drugs and that it is less clear how the risk can be managed when cbd is used without medical supervision. whether retail doses carry the same risk has not been measured.
- does cbd interact with medications?
- yes, by the only label that exists. epidiolex raises the active metabolite of clobazam, raises everolimus about 2.5-fold, and can raise or lower drugs cleared by cyp2c19, cyp1a2, cyp2b6, cyp2c8 and ugt1a9, including lowering the active form of clopidogrel; with valproate it raises the rate of liver enzyme elevations, and the valproate label carries the mirror warning. some of those enzymes also clear citalopram, escitalopram, clozapine, olanzapine and some benzodiazepines. the fda says taking cbd with other medicines "may increase or decrease the effects of the other medications". nobody has measured the effect at retail doses, which is a reason to tell the prescriber, not to assume it is nothing.
- is cbd addictive?
- the epidiolex label says no, on the best evidence there is. in a human abuse-potential study, cbd at 750 to 4,500 mg produced "drug liking" scores within the placebo range while alprazolam and synthetic thc produced large increases, and 28 days at 1,500 mg a day produced no withdrawal signs. epidiolex is not a controlled substance. this does not transfer to products that also contain thc, which one in five online products did.
sources for this section
the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.
- the legal-status paragraph on this page (epidiolex as the one approved product; no psychiatric indication; the 2018 farm bill; the fda’s position on food and supplements; the january 2023 petition denials), written from the regulator’s documents in the 2026-08-18 study harvest and quoted whole above
- the risks paragraph on this page (the 2026-08-18 study harvest’s known-risks record for cbd: the liver numbers, enzyme interactions, sedation, the suicidality warning, mislabelling, the fda’s flagged concerns)
- the "what is not known" notes on this page: the epilepsy trials excluded as off-topic for mental health, open-label anxiety-clinic series excluded, the dose gap stated, no controlled trial of daily dosing for an anxiety or mood disorder; retraction check 2026-08-18
- epidiolex (cannabidiol) oral solution prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id 8bf27097-4870-43fb-94f0-f3d0871d1eec, spl version 35, effective may 29, 2026; jazz pharmaceuticals, nda 210365): sections 1, 2.1, 4, 5.1 to 5.5, 6.1 tables 3 and 4, 7.1 to 7.4, 9.1 to 9.3
- the epidiolex label read for the library: it raises active clobazam, raises liver enzymes with valproate, and adds to alcohol (dailymed spl version 35) (library row)
- the valproate (depakote) label read for the library: carbapenem antibiotics, topiramate, cannabidiol and lamotrigine each interact in a different way (dailymed spl version 1621, april 2026) (library row)
- us food and drug administration. fda regulation of cannabis and cannabis-derived products, including cannabidiol (cbd): questions and answers, news releases and statements 2017 to 2024; read on the verification date
- us food and drug administration. what you need to know (and what we’re working to find out) about products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds, including cbd (consumer update); read on the verification date
- us food and drug administration. fda concludes that existing regulatory frameworks for foods and supplements are not appropriate for cannabidiol, will work with congress on a new way forward (statement, january 26, 2023)
- us food and drug administration. warning letters for cannabis-derived products (the running list, 2015 to 2025; page dated september 3, 2025); read on the verification date
- wilson j, dobson o, langcake a, et al. the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids for the treatment of mental disorders and substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. lancet psychiatry 2026 (an erratum is recorded on the row; no retraction) (library row)
- bergamaschi mm, queiroz rh, chagas mh, et al. cannabidiol reduces the anxiety induced by simulated public speaking in treatment-naïve social phobia patients. neuropsychopharmacology 2011 (university of são paulo cbd group; patent interests recorded on the row) (library row)
- linares im, zuardi aw, pereira lc, et al. cannabidiol presents an inverted u-shaped dose-response curve in a simulated public speaking test. brazilian journal of psychiatry 2019 (study drug supplied free by a manufacturer; four authors co-inventors on a cbd patent) (library row)
- blessing em, steenkamp mm, manzanares j, marmar cr. cannabidiol as a potential treatment for anxiety disorders. neurotherapeutics 2015 (narrative review) (library row)
- bonn-miller mo, loflin mje, thomas bf, marcu jp, hyke t, vandrey r. labeling accuracy of cannabidiol extracts sold online. jama 2017 (library row)
- cohen pa, avula b, wang yh, katragunta k, khan i. quantity of melatonin and cbd in melatonin gummies sold in the us. jama 2023 (library row)
- does cbd help anxiety? the dose-response trials, the companion page on this site, which walks through the same five study records in more detail
What the Research Shows
5 records from the 2026-08-18 harvest, each checked against PubMed and Europe PMC on that date. How a study was designed, how many people were in it, and who paid for it are printed above what it found, because those three facts decide how much the finding is worth.
Study 1 · 2026
- Meta-analysis of randomized trials
- 2,477 participants
- Top-tier journal
- Independently funded
- Preregistered
- Declared conflicts of interest
gold standard98/100Top of the evidence hierarchy, independently funded.
The most recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of cannabinoids as a primary treatment for mental disorders — 54 trials, 2,477 participants, searched to May 2025 — found no significant effect on anxiety outcomes and no randomised evidence at all for depression. Cannabinoids raised the odds of any adverse event (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.25-2.46; number needed to harm 7) without raising serious adverse events, and the authors concluded that routine use of cannabinoids for mental disorders is currently rarely justified.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 41856154 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, DOI, 54 trials and n=2477 confirmed from the abstract, along with the funding line "The National Health and Medical Research Council" read directly off the record's FUNDING field (hence INDEPENDENT) and PROSPERO registration CRD42023392718. Record carries an "Erratum in" notice (Lancet Psychiatry 2026;13(8):e11) but no retraction flag.
Study 2 · 2011
- Randomized trial
- 24 participants
- Reputable journal
- Funding not established
early signal50/100Suggestive but preliminary. Not settled.
Read this first: Conducted by the University of São Paulo CBD group (Zuardi, Crippa, and colleagues). The 2011 record carries no conflict-of-interest statement, but the same group's later publications disclose that several of these authors are co-inventors on a CBD patent that the university has licensed to pharmaceutical companies, so independence from a commercial interest in CBD cannot be assumed.
Twenty-four never-treated patients with social anxiety disorder received a single 600 mg oral dose of CBD or placebo 90 minutes before a simulated public speaking test; the CBD group reported significantly less anxiety, cognitive impairment, and discomfort during the speech than placebo, ending up close to the untreated healthy comparison group. This is a one-dose laboratory challenge in 24 people, not a treatment trial — it says nothing about whether taking CBD over weeks improves social anxiety in daily life.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 21307846 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, DOI, and n=24 randomised patients (12 CBD, 12 placebo, plus 12 untreated healthy controls) confirmed from the abstract. PMC record 3079847 fetched the same day via NCBI efetch (db=pmc) contains no funding or conflict statement, so funding is recorded UNKNOWN.
Study 3 · 2019
- Randomized trial
- 57 participants
- Reputable journal
- Mixed funding
- Declared conflicts of interest
moderate58/100Reasonable evidence with real limitations.
Read this first: The disclosure states that STI-Pharm supplied the CBD at no cost and that four authors are co-inventors of a fluorinated-CBD patent; the University of São Paulo has licensed that patent and holds an agreement with Prati-Donaduzzi to develop a synthetic CBD product for indications including anxiety disorders. Public grant money plus donated study drug and patent interests is why funding is recorded MIXED.
Fifty-seven healthy men were randomised to 150 mg, 300 mg, or 600 mg of oral CBD or placebo before a simulated public speaking test. Only the 300 mg dose significantly reduced anxiety; 150 mg and 600 mg were no different from placebo. More CBD is not better, and the dose that worked here is far above what retail CBD products deliver.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 30328956 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, DOI, and the n=57 allocation (150 mg n=15, 300 mg n=15, 600 mg n=12, placebo n=15) confirmed from the abstract, and the conflict-of-interest statement read off the same record. Europe PMC full text (PMC6781714) fetched 2026-08-18: acknowledgements state the study was supported by CNPq and FAPESP grants (CNPq/MS/SCTIE/DECIT 26/2014; 466805/2014-4), read alongside the donated-drug and patent disclosures.
Study 4 · 2015
- Narrative review
- Reputable journal
- Funding not established
contested33/100Weak or heavily disputed. Treat as a question, not an answer.
Read this first: The low score reflects study design, not disputed findings: this is a narrative review with no systematic search, no pooled estimate, and no readable funding statement, so it carries little independent evidentiary weight even though its cautious conclusion has held up.
The most-cited review of CBD for anxiety concluded that animal evidence is strong but that human evidence is limited to single acute doses, with very few studies in people who actually have an anxiety disorder and essentially none on chronic dosing. Ten years on, that gap has still not been filled by adequately powered trials.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 26341731 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, and DOI confirmed. PMC record 4604171 fetched the same day via NCBI efetch (db=pmc) returns front matter and abstract only, with no funding or conflict statement, so funding is UNKNOWN and independence is left unchecked.
Study 5 · 2017
- Cross-sectional study
- 84 participants
- Top-tier journal
- Mixed funding
- Declared conflicts of interest
early signal43/100Suggestive but preliminary. Not settled.
Read this first: Funded by the Institute for Research on Cannabinoids, a nonprofit on whose board three of the authors sit (unpaid), and two authors disclose personal fees from numerous cannabis and cannabinoid companies. The result nonetheless cuts against those commercial interests, which weakens the usual direction-of-bias concern.
Laboratory analysis of 84 CBD products bought online found that 26% contained less CBD than the label claimed and 43% contained more — roughly seven in ten were mislabelled — and delta-9 THC was detected in 21% of samples. Whatever the evidence says about a given CBD dose, a retail product cannot be assumed to contain the dose on the bottle.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 29114823 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, and DOI confirmed. PMC record 5818782 fetched the same day carries the full funding statement (Institute for Research on Cannabinoids, a 501(c)(3) supported by individual donations) and the conflict disclosures; the research letter's body text is not in PMC, so the figures (84 products, 26% under-labelled, 43% over-labelled, THC in 21%) were confirmed from the peer-reviewed commentary indexed at PMC6024459 (Pediatr Neurol Briefs 2018;32:3), which cites this paper directly. Europe PMC also lists NIDA grant R01 DA040460 against the record, hence MIXED rather than INDUSTRY or INDEPENDENT.
The Risks
Nobody checks this purchase the way a prescription is checked. No prescriber reviews it against the rest of what you take, no pharmacist screens the interaction, and no regulator confirms the dose in the capsule before it is sold. That is why this section sits here at full length rather than as a footnote.
What the paragraph below covers:
- Suicidal thoughts or behavior
- Liver injury
- Drug interactions
- What is actually in the product
- Stomach and gut
- Sedation
CBD is not inert. In the controlled epilepsy trials that supported Epidiolex, 12-13% of CBD-treated patients had ALT elevations above three times the upper limit of normal versus 1% on placebo, with some cases requiring hospitalisation; risk rises with dose and with concomitant valproate. CBD inhibits and induces multiple CYP and UGT enzymes, so it can raise or lower blood levels of other drugs — the clobazam interaction is well documented, and the same mechanism applies to many psychiatric medications. Somnolence, sedation, diarrhoea, and reduced appetite are common, and the approved labelling carries a warning for suicidal behaviour and ideation. Separately, retail CBD products are frequently mislabelled: in a JAMA analysis of 84 products bought online, only about three in ten contained the labelled amount of CBD and 21% contained detectable THC. The FDA has publicly flagged potential liver harm, drug interactions, and possible harm to the male reproductive system with long-term CBD use.
What Is Not Known
The boundaries of the section above, in the harvest’s own words. What it excluded, why, and where it looked and found nothing. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and it is not evidence of benefit either.
What Was Left Out, and Why
Quoted from the harvest, where these notes sat above the study list rather than after it. Where a note says “below” it means the studies in the section above.
- Epidiolex epilepsy trials (Devinsky 2017 NEJM and successors) excluded: they are the FDA-approved seizure indication, not a psychiatric one, and including them would inflate the apparent strength of the mental-health evidence base.
- Open-label and retrospective CBD "anxiety clinic" case series excluded in favour of the randomised and meta-analytic evidence below.
- Hauser 2023 Cochrane review of cannabis-based medicines for cancer pain was verified (PMID 37283486) but dropped as off-topic for mental health.
- The dose gap is the story: every controlled trial showing an anxiolytic signal used a single oral dose of 300 mg or 600 mg of pharmaceutical-grade CBD. No controlled trial has tested the far smaller amounts in retail CBD oils, gummies, or vapes, and no controlled trial has tested repeated daily dosing for an anxiety or mood disorder.
The Retraction Check
PubMed efetch records for all five PMIDs (21307846, 30328956, 26341731, 29114823, 41856154) inspected 2026-08-18 for "Retraction in" flags; none present. Two carry "Erratum in" notices (31672337-family errata do not apply here; 41856154 has Lancet Psychiatry 2026;13(8):e11), noted in the relevant records.
Questions for a Prescriber or Pharmacist
This page does not tell anyone to take Cannabidiol (CBD) or to avoid it. It is not able to: it does not know what else you take, what you have tried, or what you are treating. These are the questions each study above raises, written to be asked out loud.
- The largest trial review to date found no benefit of cannabinoids for anxiety and no randomised evidence for depression — is there any reason my case would be different from the people in those trials?
- The trial people cite for CBD and social anxiety used one 600 mg pharmaceutical dose in 24 people before a lab speech task — does that tell us anything useful about taking CBD daily for my anxiety?
- This trial found only the 300 mg dose helped — 150 mg and 600 mg did nothing — so how would I know whether any over-the-counter CBD product is anywhere near a dose that has ever been tested?
- The review everyone quotes says the human CBD evidence is acute-dosing only — has anything since then actually tested taking it every day for an anxiety disorder?
- If most online CBD products don't contain what the label says and one in five had detectable THC, how would I verify what is actually in a product before taking it with my other medications?
And the one to ask at the counter, whatever the answers above turn out to be: given everything I am already taking, what would you want to know about Cannabidiol (CBD) before I put it in the same body?
Open Cannabidiol (CBD) in veisund
The app has the resources behind this page and people working through the same questions.What you post there goes to people, not to a model. If someone answers, it is a person who has been there. The one automated message is a crisis-resource reply.
Where This Page Comes From
Transcribed from the study-harvest-2026-08-18 record for cannabidiol, built into this page by scripts/supplement-ingest.mjs on 2026-09-07. Nothing here is fetched at page load, and nothing here was written by a model without a citation behind it.
| Source file | study-harvest/2026-08-18/cannabidiol.yaml |
|---|---|
| Source repo | REPTechnologies/avalo-backend |
| SHA-256 | b41668e4271c48c95fc5cf5e98458679e5042cf513dfd88adba7d4d716179f97 |
| Also searched as | CBD, hemp extract, CBD oil, Epidiolex, full-spectrum hemp |
The Other Substances
- 5-HTP
- Ashwagandha
- Cannabis and THC
- Creatine
- Kratom
- L-Theanine
- Magnesium
- Melatonin
- Methylene Blue
- Microdosing
- N-Acetylcysteine (NAC)
- Omega-3
- Phenibut
- SAMe
- St John’s Wort
- Valerian
Do any supplements actually work? asks the question across all of them. The full library has the medication records, the funding investigations, and the glossary.
