Substance evidence
Methylene Blue
An MAO-A inhibitor sold as a nootropic, and the serotonin-syndrome record.
page first published · last updated
What Its Legal Status Actually Means
Read this before anything below it. Legal to sell is not the same fact as reviewed, verified, or approved.
There is no FDA-approved psychiatric indication — not for depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, cognition, or "mitochondrial support". Methylene blue is an FDA-approved drug, but only for one thing: ProvayBlue (methylene blue injection, NDA 204630, Provepharm) is indicated for the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with acquired methemoglobinemia. Methylene blue also appears as a component of some FDA-listed prescription urinary combination products for irritative voiding symptoms. Everything sold as oral methylene blue drops, capsules, or "pharmaceutical grade USP" powder for wellness or nootropic use is an unapproved product with no premarket review of purity or dose; non-pharmaceutical-grade methylene blue is an industrial dye and can carry heavy-metal contamination. Any psychiatric use is off-label and unstudied at the doses people self-administer.
Quoted whole from the 2026-08-18 study harvest. Not summarized, not shortened.
does methylene blue work for depression? what the trials and the fda say
methylene blue has an fda label, but for one product and one use: provayblue (methylene blue injection, nda 204630, approved april 8, 2016) for acquired methemoglobinemia. the label facts below are read from that label on dailymed, set id 4f6848e5-35ed-4046-b13c-3032b5ba3232, version 28, effective may 28, 2025. no oral methylene blue product has an fda label for any use, and no regulator has reviewed the drops and capsules sold for mood or cognition. the two fda safety communications are quoted from the agency’s 2011 pages, read in archived form because fda.gov no longer serves them. every trial figure is from a study record on this page, each of which is a library row linked at the end. every source is linked at the end of this section. last checked 2026-10-13.
methylene blue is a blue dye and a prescription drug, approved by the fda as an intravenous treatment for methemoglobinemia, a blood disorder, and sold online as oral drops and capsules for mood, energy and "mitochondrial support". it is also a potent inhibitor of monoamine oxidase a, the enzyme that breaks down serotonin, which puts it in the same pharmacological family as the oldest antidepressants and is the reason the fda issued two safety communications about it in 2011 and the reason its label opens with a boxed warning. the human evidence for depression is four small controlled trials, three of them from the 1980s and the newest in 37 people, and there is no controlled trial of the oral products people buy. this section says what its legal status means, what the four trials measured and in whom, what they found in both directions, and what the fda and the label say about combining it with an antidepressant. every number is from a study record on this page, the provayblue label, or the fda’s own communications, and each source is linked at the end.
this is information to take to a prescriber or pharmacist. nothing here tells anyone to take methylene blue or to stop, nothing here is a reason to stop an antidepressant, and nothing here is a reason to put off treatment that works.
what its legal status means, and does not mean
methylene blue is an fda-approved drug for exactly one thing. provayblue, a 5 mg per ml solution for intravenous infusion, is indicated for acquired methemoglobinemia in adults and children, at 1 mg per kilogram over 5 to 30 minutes, with one repeat dose allowed an hour later [label 1, 2.1, 11]. there is no fda-approved psychiatric use: not depression, not bipolar disorder, not anxiety, not cognition, not "mitochondrial support" [status]. the oral drops, capsules and "pharmaceutical grade usp" powders sold for wellness are unapproved products with no premarket review of purity or dose, and methylene blue that is not pharmaceutical grade is an industrial dye that can carry heavy-metal contamination [status]. legal to buy is not the same fact as reviewed, verified or approved, and this is not a dietary supplement: it is a drug being sold for uses no regulator has examined.
one date matters for reading the fda’s statements. when the agency issued its two 2011 communications, it wrote that "methylene blue is not an fda-approved drug at this time" [fda-2011-10]; provayblue was approved on april 8, 2016 [approval], and its label has carried the serotonin-syndrome boxed warning since. both fda communications, and the label, concern the intravenous drug given in hospitals. the agency said in october 2011 that it was "not known whether there is a risk of serotonin syndrome in patients taking serotonergic psychiatric medications who are given methylene blue by other routes (e.g., orally or by local tissue injection) or at intravenous doses lower than 1 mg/kg" [fda-2011-10]. that is an absence of data about oral use, not a finding of safety, and the trials on this page gave 15 to 300 mg a day by mouth.
what the trials measured, in whom, and for how long
the entire controlled human record for mood is four trials. in 1986, 31 people with bipolar disorder, all on lithium, took 300 mg a day of methylene blue for a year and 15 mg a day for a year in a double-blind crossover; 17 completed [naylor-1986]. in 1987 the same group compared 15 mg a day with placebo for three weeks in severe depression; the published abstract gives no sample size, no effect size and no confidence interval [naylor-1987]. in 2017, 37 people with bipolar disorder on lamotrigine took 195 mg a day and 15 mg a day for six months in a double-blind crossover, registered as nct00214877, measuring depression, mania, anxiety and cognition [alda-2017]. and in 2014, 42 adults with claustrophobia took a single 260 mg dose or placebo immediately after a session of exposure therapy, with fear measured a month later [telch-2014]. a two-page 1988 report on methylene blue in mania by the 1986 group exists in pubmed without an abstract and is not a study record here.
two design facts travel with every one of these. first, the drug turns urine blue-green: in the 2014 trial 95.6% of people on methylene blue noticed it against 21.1% on placebo, so blinding was almost certainly broken [telch-2014]. second, to protect blinding, the two bipolar trials used 15 mg a day as the "placebo", while the 1987 trial reported that 15 mg a day was itself "a potent antidepressant". if the 1987 result is right, the bipolar trials compared two active doses; if it is wrong, the only placebo-controlled depression trial of methylene blue is wrong [naylor-1987; alda-2017; exclusions]. no trial has resolved this in four decades.
what the research says, in both directions
in favour. during the 300 mg year, the 1986 patients were significantly less depressed than during the 15 mg year, with no difference in manic symptoms [naylor-1986]. the 1987 trial reported significantly greater improvement on methylene blue than on placebo and called it "a potent antidepressant" [naylor-1987]. the 2017 trial found the 195 mg dose improved depression on both scales used (p = 0.02 on the madrs, p = 0.05 on the hamilton) and anxiety (p = 0.02), mania stayed low and stable, and side effects were transient and mild [alda-2017]. in the claustrophobia trial, people whose fear was low by the end of the exposure session had less fear a month later on methylene blue than on placebo [telch-2014]. the mechanism is real: in purified human enzyme, methylene blue is a potent, tight-binding reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase a, and at the blood levels reached after intravenous dosing it would be expected to inhibit that enzyme completely [ramsay-2007].
against, or smaller than it sounds. the 1986 authors listed their own limitations: small numbers, heavy dropout, crude rating scales, doubts about blinding, and uncertainty whether 15 mg a day was a placebo at all [naylor-1986]. the 1987 abstract reports no sample size and no effect size, so its strength cannot be judged from the record, and its call for further evaluation has not been answered by an adequately powered trial in nearly forty years [naylor-1987]. the 2017 trial is 37 people, the depression result sits at the conventional threshold on one of its two scales, cognition did not improve, funding is not recorded, and it was an add-on to lamotrigine, so it says nothing about methylene blue alone [alda-2017]. the claustrophobia trial cuts both ways by design: people still moderately or highly fearful at the end of the session tended to do worse on methylene blue than on placebo, which the authors read as the drug consolidating whatever the session taught, good or bad [telch-2014]. none of the four trials tested the oral products people buy, their doses, or their purity, and the harvest records that the "nootropic" and wellness marketing has no controlled trial behind it at all [exclusions].
the interaction the fda warned about, from the agency and the label
on july 26, 2011 the fda said it had received reports of "serious central nervous system (cns) reactions when the drug methylene blue is given to patients taking psychiatric medications that work through the serotonin system of the brain", listed the drugs concerned (every ssri and snri, the tricyclics, the maois, and bupropion, buspirone, mirtazapine, trazodone, nefazodone and vilazodone), and stated the mechanism: methylene blue "is a potent, reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor (maoi)", and "healthcare professionals and patients may not realize" it. the reported events were lethargy, confusion, delirium, agitation, aggression and coma, often with muscle jerking, speech loss, rigidity, seizures, fever or raised blood pressure. its instruction for planned use was that most serotonergic drugs should be stopped at least two weeks before methylene blue, fluoxetine five weeks, and not restarted until 24 hours after the last dose [fda-2011-07]. on october 20, 2011 it added that most of the reports came from parathyroid surgery, where methylene blue is injected intravenously as a visualising agent at 1 to 8 mg per kilogram, that the cases involved people on an ssri, an snri or clomipramine, and that the risk with other psychiatric drugs, by mouth, or below 1 mg per kilogram was not known [fda-2011-10]. the antidepressant labels were changed to match: the trintellix label, for one, contraindicates starting the drug in anyone being given intravenous methylene blue and adds that "no reports involved the administration of methylene blue by other routes (such as oral tablets or local tissue injection)" [antidepressant-label].
the provayblue label says the same thing in a box. its boxed warning: it "may cause serious or fatal serotonergic syndrome when used in combination with serotonergic drugs and opioids. avoid concomitant use of provayblue with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (ssris), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (snris), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (maois) and opioids" [label, boxed warning]. section 5.1 adds that "some of the reported cases were fatal", that opioids and dextromethorphan raise the risk, and that patients should not take serotonergic drugs within 72 hours after the last dose; section 7 names bupropion, buspirone, clomipramine, mirtazapine and linezolid as well, and calls the drug "a potent reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase" [label 5.1, 7; label-row]. a 2011 review of the published cases found that 13 of 14 reports of cns toxicity with methylene blue met the hunter criteria for serotonin toxicity, that an intravenous dose of only 0.75 mg per kilogram produced blood levels high enough to inhibit monoamine oxidase a, and that severe toxicity had occurred at 1 mg per kilogram [gillman-2011]. the hunter criteria themselves are seven signs built from 2,222 overdoses: inducible muscle jerking, agitation, sweating, tremor, overactive reflexes, and in severe cases rigidity and fever [hunter-2003]. the arithmetic for a reader on an antidepressant: 1 mg per kilogram is 70 mg for a 70 kg adult, the 2017 trial gave 195 mg a day by mouth, nobody has measured what oral dose with an ssri is safe, and the only regulator to speak has said it does not know [fda-2011-10; risks].
the rest of the label. provayblue is contraindicated in g6pd deficiency, an inherited enzyme condition, because it can cause hemolytic anemia, and hemolysis can occur even without it [label 4, 5.4]; it makes pulse oximeters under-read oxygen [5.5]; it can cause confusion, dizziness and blurred vision [5.6]; it turns urine blue and interferes with urine dipstick tests [5.7]; its half-life is about 24 hours [12.3]; and intra-amniotic exposure in pregnancy has been associated with intestinal atresia and fetal death [8.1]. in overdose, 7 mg per kilogram and above brought nausea, chest pain, breathlessness, racing heart, tremor, confusion and blue staining of skin and urine, and 20 mg per kilogram and above caused severe hemolysis and death [label 10]. the common reactions in its own 31-patient trial were headache, low potassium, diarrhea, low magnesium, muscle jerking, nausea and seizure-like episodes [label 6.1].
questions for a prescriber or pharmacist about methylene blue
each one comes from a warning or a study above. they are questions, not instructions; the answers depend on a history nobody here has.
- i take an ssri, snri, tricyclic, bupropion, buspirone, mirtazapine, trazodone, tramadol or an opioid. methylene blue is a potent maoi and the provayblue label says the combination can be fatal; the fda says it does not know whether oral doses are safe. is there any amount you would be comfortable with me taking?
- the fda told prescribers to stop most serotonergic drugs two weeks before methylene blue, and fluoxetine five weeks. if i have taken methylene blue recently or plan to, what does that mean for my medication?
- the only modern trial is 37 people on lamotrigine, for bipolar depression, at 195 mg a day. does anything in it apply to my diagnosis?
- the trials used 15 to 300 mg a day of a pharmaceutical product; no regulator checks what is in the drops or capsules sold online, and non-pharmaceutical grades are industrial dye. does that change your view of any product?
- the claustrophobia trial found methylene blue made people worse if their exposure session went badly. if i am in exposure therapy or cbt, is that a risk?
- if i have g6pd deficiency, or do not know, what should i check before taking anything containing methylene blue?
questions people ask
- does methylene blue work for depression?
- not shown. the controlled evidence is four small trials: a 1986 bipolar trial with 17 completers whose authors doubted their own blinding, a 1987 three-week trial of 15 mg a day whose abstract reports no sample size, a 2017 trial of 195 mg a day in 37 people with bipolar disorder on lamotrigine that found modest improvement in depression and anxiety and none in cognition, and a 2014 single-dose trial in claustrophobia. the two bipolar trials used 15 mg a day as the placebo, the dose the 1987 trial called an antidepressant. no trial has tested the oral products sold for mood, and no adequately powered trial has been run.
- is methylene blue fda approved?
- yes, for one use. provayblue, an intravenous injection, was approved on april 8, 2016 for acquired methemoglobinemia, a blood disorder. there is no approved use for depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety or cognition, and no oral methylene blue product has an fda label for anything. the drops and capsules sold online for wellness are unapproved products with no review of purity or dose.
- can you take methylene blue with an ssri or other antidepressant?
- the provayblue label says to avoid it: its boxed warning says the combination with ssris, snris, maois and opioids "may cause serious or fatal serotonergic syndrome", and section 7 adds bupropion, buspirone, clomipramine, mirtazapine, linezolid and dextromethorphan. the fda’s 2011 communications told prescribers to stop most serotonergic drugs two weeks before intravenous methylene blue, fluoxetine five weeks, and said it did not know whether oral doses or doses below 1 mg per kilogram carried the same risk. that is a prescriber question before it is a shelf question, and nothing here is a reason to stop an antidepressant on your own.
- is methylene blue an maoi?
- yes. the fda called it "a potent, reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor" in 2011, the provayblue label calls it "a potent reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase", and a 2007 enzyme study found it a tight-binding inhibitor of monoamine oxidase a, the enzyme that breaks down serotonin, at the levels reached after intravenous dosing. that is why it interacts with antidepressants the way the old maoi drugs do.
- what did the fda say about methylene blue in 2011?
- on july 26, 2011 it reported serious central nervous system reactions in people given methylene blue while taking serotonergic psychiatric drugs, listed those drugs, explained the maoi mechanism, and told prescribers to stop most of them two weeks beforehand. on october 20, 2011 it added that most cases came from parathyroid surgery with intravenous doses of 1 to 8 mg per kilogram, involved ssris, snris or clomipramine, and that the risk by mouth or at lower doses was unknown. both communications concern the intravenous drug.
- what are the side effects of methylene blue?
- from the provayblue label: serotonin syndrome with serotonergic drugs, which has been fatal; hemolytic anemia, and it is contraindicated in g6pd deficiency; confusion, dizziness and blurred vision; blue-green urine and interference with pulse oximeters and urine tests; and in its own 31-patient trial, headache, low potassium, diarrhea, low magnesium, muscle jerking, nausea and seizure-like episodes. in overdose, 7 mg per kilogram and above caused chest pain, breathlessness and confusion, and 20 mg per kilogram and above caused severe hemolysis and death. the trials on this page reported mostly mild, transient effects at 15 to 300 mg a day by mouth, in small numbers of people.
sources for this section
the library rows link to our one-page summary of each study, with the original paper, its funding and our evidence grade on that page.
- the legal-status paragraph on this page (provayblue as the one approved product and use; no psychiatric indication; oral products unapproved with no premarket review; non-pharmaceutical grades as industrial dye), written from the regulator’s documents in the 2026-08-18 study harvest and quoted whole above
- the risks paragraph on this page (the 2026-08-18 study harvest’s known-risks record for methylene blue: monoamine oxidase a inhibition, the boxed warning, g6pd hemolysis, pulse oximetry, blinding, trial doses against consumer products)
- the "what is not known" notes on this page: the dementia trials of a different molecule excluded, animal and mechanistic work excluded, no controlled trial behind the wellness marketing; retraction check 2026-08-18
- provayblue (methylene blue) injection prescribing information, fda label on dailymed (set id 4f6848e5-35ed-4046-b13c-3032b5ba3232, version 28, effective may 28, 2025): boxed warning; sections 1, 2.1, 4, 5.1 to 5.7, 6.1, 7, 8.1, 10, 11, 12.3
- drugs@fda, nda 204630 (provayblue, provepharm), approved april 8, 2016
- fda drug safety communication, july 26, 2011: serious cns reactions possible when methylene blue is given to patients taking certain psychiatric medications (archived copy; the original fda.gov page, ucm263190, no longer resolves)
- fda drug safety communication, october 20, 2011: updated information about the drug interaction between methylene blue (methylthioninium chloride) and serotonergic psychiatric medications (archived copy; the original fda.gov page, ucm276119, no longer resolves)
- the provayblue label’s boxed warning and serotonin-syndrome sections, read for the library (openfda record, effective may 28, 2025) (library row)
- naylor gj, martin b, hopwood se, watson y. a two-year double-blind crossover trial of the prophylactic effect of methylene blue in manic-depressive psychosis. biological psychiatry 1986 (library row)
- naylor gj, smith ah, connelly p. a controlled trial of methylene blue in severe depressive illness. biological psychiatry 1987 (library row)
- alda m, mckinnon m, blagdon r, et al. methylene blue treatment for residual symptoms of bipolar disorder: randomised crossover study. british journal of psychiatry 2017 (library row)
- telch mj, bruchey ak, rosenfield d, et al. effects of post-session administration of methylene blue on fear extinction and contextual memory in adults with claustrophobia. american journal of psychiatry 2014 (library row)
- ramsay rr, dunford c, gillman pk. methylene blue and serotonin toxicity: inhibition of monoamine oxidase a (mao a) confirms a theoretical prediction. british journal of pharmacology 2007;152(6):946-951 (abstract read via pubmed 17721552; not yet a library row)
- gillman pk. cns toxicity involving methylene blue: the exemplar for understanding and predicting drug interactions that precipitate serotonin toxicity. journal of psychopharmacology 2011;25(3):429-436 (abstract read via pubmed 20142303; not yet a library row)
- dunkley ej, et al. the hunter serotonin toxicity criteria. qjm 2003 (library row)
- the trintellix (vortioxetine) label’s contraindication and serotonin-syndrome wording on intravenous methylene blue, quoted on this site’s vortioxetine explainer
What the Research Shows
5 records from the 2026-08-18 harvest, each checked against PubMed and Europe PMC on that date. How a study was designed, how many people were in it, and who paid for it are printed above what it found, because those three facts decide how much the finding is worth.
Study 1 · 2025
- Regulatory action
- Government body
- No funding reported
strong82/100Well-supported by good-quality research.
FDA-approved labeling states that methylene blue is indicated only for acquired methemoglobinemia and carries a boxed warning that it "may cause serious or fatal serotonergic syndrome when used in combination with serotonergic drugs and opioids", instructing prescribers to avoid concomitant use with SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, and opioids. The labeling attributes this to methylene blue being a potent reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase, and notes that some reported cases were fatal.
How this record was checked
openFDA drug-label API record for PROVAYBLUE (set_id 4f6848e5-35ed-4046-b13c-3032b5ba3232, effective 2025-05-28) fetched 2026-08-18; the boxed warning, section 5.1 (Serotonin Syndrome with Concomitant Use of Serotonergic Drugs and Opioids), section 7 drug interactions, and the sole indication for acquired methemoglobinemia were read verbatim from that record. Application NDA 204630 (sponsor Provepharm SAS) confirmed via the openFDA Drugs@FDA API the same day, and the FDA-hosted prescribing-information PDF at the cited accessdata.fda.gov URL confirmed live (HTTP 200) on 2026-08-18.
Study 2 · 2014
- Randomized trial
- 42 participants
- Top-tier journal
- Independently funded
- Declared conflicts of interest
strong81/100Well-supported by good-quality research.
Read this first: Blinding was almost certainly compromised: 95.6% of methylene blue participants reported blue-green urine discoloration versus 21.1% on placebo. The subgroup finding that drives the headline result was predicted in advance but comes from splitting 42 people by post-training fear level, so it needs replication before it means much.
42 adults with marked claustrophobic fear were randomised to 260 mg of methylene blue or placebo immediately after six exposure trials. The drug did not simply improve outcomes: participants whose fear was low by the end of the session had less fear at one-month follow-up on methylene blue, while those still moderately or highly fearful tended to do worse on it than on placebo. Methylene blue appears to consolidate whatever was learned in the session, good or bad.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 25018057 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, DOI, and the allocation (23 methylene blue, 19 placebo; n=42) confirmed from the abstract. PMC full text 4467026 fetched the same day via NCBI efetch (db=pmc) states "This work was supported in part by NIH grant R01 MH076847" and "The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests", hence funding INDEPENDENT and conflicts disclosed; the side-effect table in that full text is the source of the urine-discoloration figures.
Study 3 · 2017
- Randomized trial
- 37 participants
- Reputable journal
- Funding not established
- Preregistered
moderate63/100Reasonable evidence with real limitations.
Read this first: The comparator was not inert: the "placebo" arm was 15 mg/day of methylene blue, chosen to preserve blinding because the drug discolours urine. Since a 1987 trial by Naylor reported that 15 mg/day itself acted as an antidepressant, the true drug-versus- nothing effect could be either larger or smaller than the reported difference.
37 people with bipolar disorder already on lamotrigine took 195 mg/day of methylene blue and 15 mg/day in a six-month double-blind crossover. The active dose modestly improved depression (MADRS p=0.02, HAM-D p=0.05) and anxiety (HAM-A p=0.02) but not cognition, and was well tolerated. This is the only modern controlled psychiatric trial of methylene blue, and 37 people is not enough to establish an effect size anyone should plan treatment around.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 27284082 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal (Br J Psychiatry 2017;210(1):54-60, epub 9 June 2016), year, DOI, n=37 enrolled, the 195 mg versus 15 mg design, six-month duration, trial registration NCT00214877, and all reported p-values confirmed from the abstract. Europe PMC core record checked the same day: not open access, not in PMC, no grant or funding statement retrievable, so funding is recorded UNKNOWN and independence left unchecked.
Study 4 · 1986
- Randomized trial
- 31 participants
- Reputable journal
- Funding not established
moderate57/100Reasonable evidence with real limitations.
Read this first: Nearly half the enrolled participants did not complete, the comparator was a low dose of the same drug rather than an inert placebo, and methylene blue's blue-green urine makes blinding difficult at any dose — all conceded in the paper. Everyone was also on lithium, so this tests methylene blue only as an add-on.
31 people with bipolar disorder, all maintained on lithium, spent one year on 300 mg/day of methylene blue and one year on 15 mg/day in a double-blind crossover; only 17 completed. They were significantly less depressed during the high-dose year, with no difference in manic symptoms. The authors themselves listed the limitations: small numbers, heavy dropout, crude rating scales, doubtful blinding, and no certainty that 15 mg/day was really a placebo.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 3091097 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, DOI, n=31 enrolled with 17 completers, the 300 mg versus 15 mg crossover design, and the authors' stated limitations confirmed from the abstract. Europe PMC core record checked the same day: not open access, no grant or funding statement available for a 1986 paper, so funding is UNKNOWN and independence left unchecked.
Study 5 · 1987
- Randomized trial
- Reputable journal
- Funding not established
moderate58/100Reasonable evidence with real limitations.
Read this first: The published abstract gives no sample size, no effect size, and no confidence intervals, so the strength of the result cannot be assessed from the record; sample size is recorded as unknown rather than guessed. The dose it found effective, 15 mg/day, is the same dose the same group's 1986 trial and Alda's 2017 trial both used as the comparator — a direct internal contradiction in this small literature that has never been resolved.
A three-week controlled trial compared 15 mg/day of methylene blue with placebo in severe depressive illness and reported significantly greater improvement on methylene blue, concluding it "appears to be a potent antidepressant". Nearly forty years later that call for further clinical evaluation has still not been answered by an adequately powered trial.
How this record was checked
PubMed record 3555627 fetched via NCBI efetch 2026-08-18; title, authors, journal, year, DOI, the 15 mg/day dose, three-week duration, and placebo comparison confirmed from the abstract. No sample size is reported anywhere in the record, and the paper is not open access or in PMC, so sampleSize is null and funding UNKNOWN.
The Risks
Nobody checks this purchase the way a prescription is checked. No prescriber reviews it against the rest of what you take, no pharmacist screens the interaction, and no regulator confirms the dose in the capsule before it is sold. That is why this section sits here at full length rather than as a footnote.
What the paragraph below covers:
- Serotonin syndrome
- Drug interactions
The central risk is pharmacological, not hypothetical: methylene blue is a potent reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A. The FDA-approved labeling for ProvayBlue carries a boxed warning that it may cause serious or fatal serotonin syndrome when combined with serotonergic drugs and opioids, and directs clinicians to avoid concomitant use with SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, and opioids; the labeling also names bupropion, buspirone, clomipramine, mirtazapine, linezolid, and dextromethorphan, and states that some reported cases were fatal. Anyone taking an antidepressant is in the interaction zone. Beyond that: methylene blue causes haemolytic anaemia in people with G6PD deficiency and can worsen methemoglobinemia at high doses; it interferes with pulse oximetry; it turns urine and sometimes stool blue-green, which makes genuine blinding in trials nearly impossible; and it can cause hypersensitivity reactions, and neurologic and visual symptoms affecting driving. Doses used in the psychiatric studies (195-300 mg/day) are far above the amounts in consumer products, and neither has been shown safe for long-term self-administration.
What Is Not Known
The boundaries of the section above, in the harvest’s own words. What it excluded, why, and where it looked and found nothing. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and it is not evidence of benefit either.
What Was Left Out, and Why
Quoted from the harvest, where these notes sat above the study list rather than after it. Where a note says “below” it means the studies in the section above.
- Alzheimer's/frontotemporal dementia trials of the methylene blue derivative leuco-methylthioninium (LMTM/TRx0237) excluded: different molecule, different indication, and the pivotal trials were industry-sponsored and failed their primary endpoints.
- Animal and mechanistic work on methylene blue as a mitochondrial/cytochrome-oxidase enhancer excluded; only human controlled evidence is included.
- Wellness and "nootropic" marketing of oral methylene blue has no controlled trial behind it at all. The entire human psychiatric evidence base is the four small trials below, three of which are 30-40 years old.
The Retraction Check
PubMed efetch records for all four PMIDs (3091097, 3555627, 27284082, 25018057) inspected 2026-08-18 for "Retraction in" flags; none present. The FDA labeling record was checked against the live openFDA drug-label API the same day.
Questions for a Prescriber or Pharmacist
This page does not tell anyone to take Methylene Blue or to avoid it. It is not able to: it does not know what else you take, what you have tried, or what you are treating. These are the questions each study above raises, written to be asked out loud.
- I am taking methylene blue (or thinking about it) while on an antidepressant — given the FDA boxed warning about fatal serotonin syndrome, is there any dose of this that is safe for me?
- This drug seems to strengthen whatever the exposure session taught — including a bad session. If I am doing exposure therapy, is that a risk worth taking?
- The only recent controlled trial of methylene blue in bipolar disorder had 37 people and was an add-on to lamotrigine — is there a better-supported add-on for my residual depression?
- The original methylene blue bipolar trial is from 1986, had 17 completers, and its authors doubted their own blinding — is there any reason to prefer it over treatments with modern evidence?
- A 1987 trial called methylene blue a potent antidepressant and nobody has run a proper trial since — does that absence of follow-up tell us something?
And the one to ask at the counter, whatever the answers above turn out to be: given everything I am already taking, what would you want to know about Methylene Blue before I put it in the same body?
Open Methylene Blue in veisund
The app has the resources behind this page and people working through the same questions.What you post there goes to people, not to a model. If someone answers, it is a person who has been there. The one automated message is a crisis-resource reply.
Where This Page Comes From
Transcribed from the study-harvest-2026-08-18 record for methylene-blue, built into this page by scripts/supplement-ingest.mjs on 2026-09-07. Nothing here is fetched at page load, and nothing here was written by a model without a citation behind it.
| Source file | study-harvest/2026-08-18/methylene-blue.yaml |
|---|---|
| Source repo | REPTechnologies/avalo-backend |
| SHA-256 | 188fa48dbe1d02bcf30ee50b69154cae70bd481192282a40f417a82fb4de288e |
| Also searched as | ProvayBlue, methylthioninium chloride, methylene blue USP, MB |
The Other Substances
- 5-HTP
- Ashwagandha
- Cannabidiol (CBD)
- Cannabis and THC
- Creatine
- Kratom
- L-Theanine
- Magnesium
- Melatonin
- Microdosing
- N-Acetylcysteine (NAC)
- Omega-3
- Phenibut
- SAMe
- St John’s Wort
- Valerian
Do any supplements actually work? asks the question across all of them. The full library has the medication records, the funding investigations, and the glossary.
